Despite advances in medical technology, the stethoscope still has an important diagnostic value, according to an editorial published online January 15 on Journals of the American College of Cardiology.
Valentin Fuster, M.D., Ph.D., mount Sinai Hospital in New York, discusses the continuing importance of the stethoscope, which is often ignored by newer technologies such as echocardiogram.
Fuster writes that the importance of stethoscopes lies in allowing doctors to physically hear the sounds of the body. Two examples of the importance of auscultation that had been found in the previous 48 hours included pericardial massage in a patient with acute chest pain and fever, in which echocardiographic images did not show pericardial effusion, and a high P2 of the second cardiac sound, which an echocardiogram had not been able to detect in a patient with clear pulmonary hypertension. Despite increased ultrasound training at the point of care, the risk of misdiagnosis is high when used by inexperienced practitioners.
“In my opinion, practically and economically, echocardiography systems are not – and never will be – prepared to fully eradicate the stethoscope, since it is not possible for all clinicians to have portable echocardiography inside and outside the United States,” Fuster writes. “Thus, we cannot discontinue the important formation that occurs during the physical examination, which can be helped through the amplified sounds of a stethoscope.”
Pingback:levitra generic online
Pingback:lamotrigine 100 mg pill
Pingback:flagyl 500 mg
Pingback:furosemide 20 mg price
Pingback:esomeprazole 20mg tablets
Pingback:tadalafil off brand
Pingback:orlistat medication cost
Pingback:sildenafil pronunciation key
Pingback:semaglutide price drop
Pingback:ozempic semaglutide dosage chart
Pingback:topamax for weight loss
Pingback:doxycycline hyclate for males
Pingback:is doxycycline safe for kittens
Pingback:cialis side effects heart
Pingback:ketoconazole cream for scaling
Pingback:ketoconazole mechanism study
Pingback:acular ketorolac treatment
Pingback:ivermectin demodex findings
Pingback:minoxidil 2% vs 5% potency comparison
Pingback:minoxidil mechanism technical overview
Pingback:minoxidil women’s guide